Agency vs In-House: What Works Best for Manufacturing Marketing?

The True Cost of In-House Marketing Teams

Building an internal marketing department appears straightforward on paper. However, the total cost of marketing ownership extends well beyond base salaries.

‍

A functional three-person manufacturing marketing team typically includes a marketing manager, content creator, and digital specialist. According to 2025 industry data, this configuration costs between £280,000 and £420,000 annually when accounting for salaries, contributions, benefits, equipment, and software licenses. That figure excludes recruitment fees, training costs, and the management overhead required to coordinate activities.

‍

Benefits packages add approximately 30% to base salaries. Equipment, marketing automation platforms, and analytics tools contribute another £35,000 to £50,000 per year. Recruitment and onboarding expenses often reach 20-30% of first-year salaries. These hidden costs accumulate rapidly.

‍

Here's the practical reality. A marketing manager commands £75,000 to £95,000 in base salary. Add a content writer at £35,000 to £45,000 and a paid media specialist at £40,000 to £55,000. Factor in employer National Insurance contributions, pension contributions, and benefits. The baseline quickly approaches £200,000 before considering software, training, or management time.

‍

For manufacturing firms generating £10 million to £50 million in annual revenue, this represents a substantial fixed cost commitment. Industry benchmarks indicate manufacturing companies typically allocate 5-7.5% of revenue to marketing activities. An in-house team can consume the majority of this budget in personnel costs alone, leaving limited resources for campaign execution, paid advertising, or content production.

‍

The manufacturing marketing capability gap becomes evident when specialised needs arise. Technical content writing for manufacturers requires sector knowledge. Video production demands videography expertise. PPC campaign management requires a depth of knowledge and practical experience. One or two generalist employees rarely possess the breadth of skills required across all channels.

‍

Agency Partnership Economics and Value Proposition

Industrial marketing consultants operate under a fundamentally different economic model. Agencies distribute their overhead across multiple clients, providing access to specialist capabilities without the fixed costs of full-time employment.

‍

Manufacturing marketing retainer costs typically range from £3,000 to £12,000 per month for comprehensive services. A £6,000 monthly retainer (£72,000 annually) delivers access to strategists, copywriters, designers, SEO specialists, and paid media experts. This represents roughly one-third to one-quarter of the cost of an equivalent in-house team.

‍

The value equation extends beyond hourly rates. Agencies maintain subscriptions to enterprise-grade tools for analytics, SEO, paid advertising, and marketing automation. These platforms would cost an individual manufacturer £20,000 to £40,000 annually if purchased separately. Agency clients benefit from this infrastructure without bearing direct costs.

‍

When evaluating a potential manufacturing marketing agency, you want to understand specific capabilities. Does the agency demonstrate sector expertise? Can they produce technical content that resonates with engineers and procurement teams? Have they generated measurable results for comparable manufacturers?‍

‍

Recent data shows 52.3% of B2B organisations increased marketing budgets for 2026, with manufacturing firms showing particular interest in outsourced manufacturing marketing support. This trend reflects recognition that specialised agencies often deliver superior results compared to thinly-stretched internal teams.

‍

The agency model provides flexibility that fixed employment cannot match. Need additional capacity for a product launch? Agencies scale resources accordingly. Require specialised videography for a trade show? Agencies coordinate production without hiring permanent staff. This flexibility proves particularly valuable for SMEs with fluctuating marketing demands.

‍

Hybrid Marketing Models for Manufacturing Firms

The choice between a marketing agency vs in-house marketing creates a false dichotomy. Progressive manufacturers increasingly adopt hybrid approaches that combine internal coordination with external execution.

‍

A hybrid marketing model typically positions a senior marketing manager or director in-house, supported by agency partners for specialised execution. The internal role provides strategic oversight, maintains institutional knowledge, and ensures marketing and sales alignment with the wider business. The agency handles content production, campaign execution, technical SEO, paid media management and other marketing tactics.

‍

This configuration costs significantly less than building a full internal team while maintaining greater control than pure outsourcing. A marketing director's salary ranges from £55,000 to £85,000. Combined with a £4,000 to £8,000 monthly agency retainer (£48,000 to £96,000 annually), total annual costs remain between £103,000 and £181,000. This delivers superior capability at roughly one-third to one-half the cost of a complete in-house department.

‍

The hybrid model addresses common concerns about agency relationships. Internal leadership ensures brand consistency, maintains buyer relationships, and provides the context agencies require for effective execution. External partners contribute specialised skills, fresh perspectives, and scalable capacity.

‍

For manufacturing marketing support, hybrid arrangements work particularly well when internal resources focus on strategic planning, market intelligence, and sales enablement, while agencies handle industrial lead generation support, technical content writing for manufacturers, and manufacturing case study production support.

‍

Making the Strategic Decision

Confirming marketing KPIs for leadership should guide this decision, alongside several practical considerations.

‍

Organisational maturity matters significantly. Startups and smaller manufacturers with limited marketing infrastructure often benefit more from agency partnerships that provide immediate capability. Established firms with existing teams may find hybrid models allow optimisation without wholesale restructuring.

‍

Skillset requirements vary by sector and go-to-market strategy. Firms selling highly technical products to engineers need different capabilities than those focused on distributor relationships. Questions to ask industrial marketing consultants include their experience producing technical documentation, their understanding of complex sales cycles, and their ability to demonstrate attribution for industrial purchases.

‍

Budget predictability influences model selection. In-house costs remain relatively fixed regardless of campaign intensity. Agency retainers provide flexibility, though project work can introduce variability. Evaluate your tolerance for fixed versus variable marketing expenditure.

‍

The marketing attribution question proves critical. Can you measure which activities generate pipeline activity? Do you understand your cost per qualified lead? Marketing agency evaluation checklists should prioritise agencies that implement robust tracking and provide transparent reporting on marketing and sales alignment.

‍

Consider the agency onboarding timeline. Effective partnerships require 60 to 90 days for agencies to understand your products, customers, and competitive landscape. This learning curve exists regardless of model, though in-house teams face steeper onboarding as they lack the sector pattern recognition that agencies develop across multiple clients.

‍

Making Your Choice

The right structure for your organisation depends on your specific circumstances, growth objectives, and resource constraints. Neither solely in-house nor pure agency represents a universally superior solution.

‍

Evaluate your organisation's current position. Do you have existing marketing capability to build upon? What specific gaps require addressing? Can you afford the £300,000 to £500,000 required for a complete in-house department, or does the £72,000 to £144,000 agency investment make more strategic sense?

‍

For most SME manufacturers, hybrid models offer the best balance of control, capability, and cost efficiency. Internal strategic leadership combined with specialised agency execution delivers results without the overhead burden of building comprehensive in-house teams.

‍

This decision shapes your competitive positioning for years to come. Assess your options methodically, evaluate total ownership costs honestly, and select the model that aligns with both your current reality and growth ambitions.

Your choice determines whether marketing becomes a strategic advantage or a resource drain. Choose wisely.

‍

Need advice on your marketing structure? Solvi Digital specialises in helping manufacturing and industrial businesses build effective marketing strategies, whether that means supporting your in-house team, providing a complete agency partnership, or designing a hybrid model tailored to your needs. Get in touch to discuss which approach delivers the best results for your business.